|
The New Basics Cookbook | 
| Authors: Julee Rosso, Sheila Lukins
Brand: Workman Press
Category: Book
List Price: $19.95
Buy Used: $0.01
You Save: $19.94 (100%)
New (39) Used (115) Collectible (7) from $0.01
Rating:  92 reviews
Sales Rank: 13336
Media: Paperback
Pages: 864
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 3.3
Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 7.9 x 1.8
MPN: 1341
ISBN: 0894803417
Dewey Decimal Number: 641.5
UPC: 019628013415
EAN: 9780894803413
ASIN: 0894803417
Publication Date: January 10, 1989
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Binding is slightly damaged and/or book has some loose pages. No missing pages. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Shipped to over one million happy customers. Your purchase benefits world literacy!
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
It is the 1.8-million-copy bestselling cookbook that has become a modern-day classic. Beginning cooks will learn how to boil an egg. Experienced cooks will discover new ingredients and inspired approaches to familiar ones.Encyclopedic in scope, rich with
Amazon.com
While it won't tell you how to boil an egg, Lukins and Rosso's The New Basics has proved itself a modern classic, fit to reside on your shelves next to The Joy of Cooking and The Fannie Farmer Cookbook. Aspiring chefs can use this 850-page tome to plan their next cocktail party (try the Raspberry Dip with Crudites), make brunch for the in-laws (how about Smoked Salmon and Leek Frittata and a Chicory and Bacon Salad?), or even bake up a batch of Pinwheel Cookies for the office. The "basics" include tips for entertaining, a glossary of cooking and wine terms, suggestions for a well- stocked pantry, and instructions on how to pick the best seasonal ingredients. Menus and delightful culinary quotes are sprinkled throughout the book, and the chatty tone will inspire confidence in every kitchen.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 87 more reviews...
 new basics cookbook June 12, 2008
Steven Grabianowski
Wonderful cookbok, great recipies. I bought my wife a new copy and we give the book out as gifts.
 Shouldn't be called basics June 11, 2008
A. Mazour (Renton, WA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
When I think of a 'basics' cookbook, I think of the simple version of the recipe, or an least ingredients I can find easily at a super market. I am sure the recipes in here are delicious, however I am far to intimidated to try them because I don't even know what most of the igredients or final products are. The format of the book is fantastic. I do love flipping through it!!!
Best cook book I own. May 29, 2008
L.H.
I love to cook and I have many cook books. The typical problem with cook books is that they often call for ingredients I don't have on hand or outlandish amounts of time that a single working mom just doesn't have. This cook book is phenomenal. It calls for basic types of ingredients (basic for me anyway), easy steps and phenomenal outcomes. Since I got this cookbook I've averaged using it 3x/week which is a great deal for me. I plan on using this cook book as gifts for neices/nephews as they graduate as well as wedding/baby showers gifts. Another great aspect of the book is that it gives great ideas for setting up your kitchen (utensils, ingredient to have on hand, etc.) and teaches many basics things that either you didn't know you didn't know or that you were too embarrassed to ask about. Buy it!
 "The New Basics" - An Adventure in False Advertising May 17, 2008
kittenkatt (Kansas City, MO)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
After moving into my first apartment while in college I bought this cookbook hoping it would be the only cookbook I'd need - 10 years later I've perhaps made a total of 10 recipes and each one has been underwhelming to say the least, never to be repeated. As far as actual recipes go, it is by far the least useful cookbook in my house.
Lets start with the so-called "basics." New England Clam Chowder, to me the ultimate comfort soup. Using this book's recipe the result is an off-color (too dark, likely due to the massive amount of bacon it calls for), too thick, and simply odd-tasting - lacking flavor and possessing an obvious misdirected flavor at the same time. I'd never had more respect for Campbell's. Years later I tried another clam chowder recipe, this time from Williams Sonoma's simply named "Soup" cookbook. It was fantastic! Comparing the 2 recipes, I can now see that The New Basics recipe's flaws lie in the massive amounts of dried thyme and bacon (Williams's Sonoma uses a modest amount of salt ham and no thyme) combined with the complete absence of celery, onion, and fish stock (Lukins and Rosso use water) - simple omissions that completely make or break the success of a clam chowder recipe. These types of flavor and ingredient errors abound and I seriously doubt many of their recipes were actually tested by Lukins or Rosso. Here's another comparison between the same 2 books: Seafood Gumbo, another recipe I consider a "basic": the William's Sonoma Cookbook calls for simply shrimp, crab, and andouille sausage for the meat part of the recipe and uses fish stock. Lukins and Rosso's (chicken stock based) Seafood Gumbo recipe calls for 12 oz sea scallops, 1 pound shrimp, 12 oz LOBSTER, 8 oz crabmeat, and kielbasa (huh?) sausage. Clearly Lukins and Rosso have the motto, "Why spend $25 making a gumbo when you could instead spend $125?"
Beyond the "Basics," which are actually few and far between in this book, you will find countless recipes that will take days to track down rare ingredients, 4 hours to actually cook, and may result in your guests saying, "This is so, um... interesting" as they anxiously await you to say, "I know - it's crap. Lets order Chinese." You'll also need to call in a maid-service to clean all of the pans you've dirtied. But, then again who could resist the hassle of tracking down juniper berries, rutabaga, and pitted dates to add to their 21 ingredient "Venison Stew" recipe? Or instead you could opt for "Grouse on Toast," especially since the authors so cheekily write, "Whether you're lucky enough to have wood grouse, black grouse, red grouse or white grouse, this 'less is more' preparation is best." Seriously, I think I just vomited in my mouth a little bit. By the way, Lukins and Rosso's "Lady Baltimore Cake" holds the special distinction of being the only cake ever to somehow manage to make my boyfriend and me simultaneously gag. True story.
To give credit where credit is due there is a great deal of useful information in "The New Basics." For instance, each section of the book gives a detailed description of various ingredients - the flavors, textures, etc. The herb, fish, and poultry tables along with the roasting charts have been particularly helpful when I am concocting my own recipes. Furthermore, I'm sure there are good recipes in this book - I've simply had too many disasters to justify opting for this book's recipes when I have plenty of other cookbooks that have given me a 100% success rate. Learning to trust my own insticts has perhaps been the best lesson from this book - if a recipe sounds weird, it probably tastes weird.
Overall, "The New Basics" adheres to an unapolagetic 1980's cooking style - pretentious, fussy, and overdone. I find it so refreshing that modern cookbooks have completely rejected this style and instead feature simple flavor combinations, quick preparation, and, most importantly, ACCESSIBLE, AFFORDABLE ingredients. Photographs don't hurt either. Every Williams Sonoma cookbook, "Gordon Ramsay's Fast Food" and Ellie Krieger's "The Food You Crave" are among my current favorites.
Not Dated March 7, 2008
Nancy Lindquist
I love this cookbook. I've had it since the year it was printed, 1989 and I use it at least twice a month. Yes, it has some passages I laugh at now, "The risotto rage," being one of them, but many of the preparations are wonderful and timeless. I especially love the soups section, which has four, "go to" soup recipes in it I use all the time. This book sits in my kitchen and not on the shelf in the family room, as most of my collection does.
|
|
|
| |
